What are five things that annoy you?

They might answer:

1. People going poop when you’re playing with them [?]
2. Having to go home/no sleepovers on the weekend
3. Kids that go “TUHTUH” when they find out something cool
4. People making the “Hoouah!” when they try to be a ninja
5. Video games that don’t have violence

These answers came from genuine eight-year olds and do not reflect my views or opinion.. or do they?

[?] denotes an answer that is incredibly strange or just plain unexpected

Please, please, submit your questions to me by using the Contact link above!

Coming next week: When You Ask An Eight Year Old… What would you like to invent?

Me: Hey, Georgia! What’s up?

Georgia: Well, my president was shot. Technically, that’s not true, but it makes a good headline. What really happened is this: On Sunday, November 23rd, my president, Mikheil Saakashvili, and Polish president Lech Kaczyinski were shot at in their traveling motorcade. The presidents’ motorcade was stopped by a Russian patrol shortly before the firing occurred. The group turned back after being attacked by a burst of automatic gunfire. Luckily, nobody was hurt, including the plethora of bodyguards. Russian officials deny the attacks came from them, and it is unclear exactly who fired the guns.

Me: Personally, I think the shots were in fact fired by Russians. They have been increasingly provocative against you, Georgia. And the firing happened coincidentally after the motorcade was stopped by a Russian patrol, yet another clue that the attackers are Russian. I also heard that the Polish president claims he heard shouting in Russian, and there was a shaky camera present. But neither sources are conclusive and it remains undetermined who did the shooting. I’m just glad that nobody was hurt!

Georgia: Thanks, Spencer. Hope to talk to you soon!

Here’s what really actually happened (copied from VOANews.com)

By Stefan Bos

Georgian officials say shots were fired at a motorcade carrying the presidents of Georgia and Poland. No injuries were reported. The Georgian leader blames Russian troops in Georgia’s breakaway region of South Ossetia for Sunday’s incident. But as Stefan Bos reports from Budapest, Russia’s military and South Ossetia have denied their forces were involved in the gunfire.

Flanked by bodyguards Georgia’s President Mikheil Saakashvili, second from right, and his Polish counterpart Lech Kaczyinski (r) are seen shortly after shots were fired at their motorcade, 23 Nov 2008

Shaky television pictures showed a convoy carrying Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili and his Polish counterpart, Lech Kaczynski, turning back amid automatic gunfire.

The incident occurred after the motorcade was allegedly stopped by a Russian patrol while traveling to a refugee camp in Georgia, near the breakaway region of South Ossetia.

It is unclear from television footage who might have been shooting. Mr. Saakashvili blamed Russian troops manning a checkpoint on the border with South Ossetia.

Russian and South Ossetian authorities strongly denied their troops attacked the motorcade. South Ossetian defense official Ibrahim Gassaev accused Georgia of “distributing misinformation,” while a Russian military official in the area said allegations of Russian troops firing on the convoy “do not correspond to reality”.

But, Poland’s President Kaczynski said suggestions that the incident was staged are “lies”.

Mr. Kaczynski noted that although he heard people shouting in Russian, he could not determine whether the shots were directed at the presidential motorcade.

The Polish president was in Georgia to mark the fifth anniversary of Georgia’s Rose Revolution that swept Mikheil Saakashvili into office.

But the celebrations were overshadowed by concerns about the aftermath of a brief war in August between Russia and Georgia over South Ossetia and Georgia’s other breakaway region, Abkhazia. After the conflict, Russia recognized both areas as independent states and stationed thousands of troops there.

At a religious ceremony marking the anniversary of the Rose Revolution, President Saakashvili made clear that the struggle for a reunited Georgia would continue.

Mr. Saakashvili’s remarks were translated into English by EuroNews television.

“Georgia is here, and here it will stay,”said Mikheil Saakashvili. “Those people who wish we would disappear will be defeated in the end. We must come together and continue our struggle because it is just.”

Yet the recent war with Russia and continuing violence have fueled protests against President Saakashvili.

Earlier Sunday, Nino Burjanadze, who helped launch the Rose Revolution, announced the formation of a new political party to challenge Mr. Saakashvili’s leadership.

Ranked in order of [estimated] deliciousness.

1. Picnik

Amazing!

2. Mashface Beta

Littered with face parts, Mashface gives a strong first impression. The home page has an introduction video featuring so-called mashes of Barack Obama and John McCain, along with some other guy I don’t know, maybe Tom Cruise. The site’s purpose, to literally mash different faces together, is quite clever, and the interface is well-suited for it.

3. PhotoFunia

This one lets you add you or one of your pictures to many different settings, from Time Square to Angelina Jolie’s shirt. Some of the options use face detecting technology, allowing you to turn yourself into a lot of things, like Santa Claus, a Jedi, or Mona Lisa.

4. DrPic

Equipped with the basic weapons of edit, DrPic is a relatively basic editor.

5. Picture2Life

Like DrPic, it has all the basics, and a little bit more.

6. PICFONT

Lets you add text to images. Helpful, but not so special.

7. FACEinHOLE

Very similar to PhotoFunia. It lets you add your own face to different pictures. Its not as advanced as PhotoFunia, though.

8. TEXT-IMAGE

Very simple design with a simple purpose.

Comment below! Share your opinions and suggestions, and please consider sharing this article!

If you can’t see the video, click here, or go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19z7EvWnGLk

Extreme Action Sports Movie from Spencer Tweedy on Vimeo.

People watch hundreds of millions of videos every day,

and according to the YouTube Fact Sheet, ten hours of video are uploaded every minute. Wow.

Launched in 2005, YouTube.com has grown to be one of the most visited websites of all time. But can you guess who owns it? Yes, of course! Google! Adding yet another hit to there ever-growing collection of websites. As result of the crazy amount of traffic YouTube has drawn, I wonder, “Why do people spend hours a day, watching random videos?” That question can be answered in many different ways, some of which we’ll not get into.

Not unlike many other websites (and all other media, as well), YouTube has three key purposes. Each one draws a different type of audience. Some videos are more attractive than others (i.e. How To Make A Potato Gun, a helpful guide, might be more popular than Extreme Action Sports Movie, some random kid’s skateboarding video). But the three purposes, or functions, of YouTube have rocketed it to the top of the interweb, as my mother, Andrew Wilkinson, and I call it.

YouTube is to:

1. Entertainment is the chief motive of YouTube. Drawing a plethora of video-trollers out of the woodwork, entertainment can be accounted for as the #1 purpose of online video.
2. Information is in high-demand. Always. Many people come to YouTube as a guide. The hundreds of thousands of How-To videos provide a quick and easy outlet for the incompetent (or not) American (or not) to access information.
3. I totally forgot what the last one was. Oh well!

I’ve turned to YouTube for all two and a half of these reasons. Entertainment? Actually, that one not too much. The only time I used YouTube for that was before I discovered Hulu, the TV’s killer.  Nowadays, in an effort to resist the epidemic of video-addiction, I rarely visit YouTube, despite its helpfulness when assembling a SpringFree™ trampoline. I actually know people who spend the entire day trolling the site, hoping they find that precious video, the video that’s actually interesting. Okay, maybe not entire days, but a long time.

In the spirit of the holiday season, happy viewing, merry Tube-ing, and have a good time!

Unfortunately, the name ‘The Blisters’ was already used–more than once. If we ever wanted to record, we would be required to change our name. Eventually we decided on Tully Monster, which was promptly changed to Tullymonster, which was promptly discovered to also be copyrighted. Feeling very dismayed, we’re still on the course of deciding our third, and hopefully permanent band name (any suggestions? Comment below!). And, just to top it off, we painstakingly asked one of our members to leave, leaving the rest of us a trio.

But on the bright side, we have a growing and all-original set, with self-proclaimed [by me] delicious songs. Once in a while, we’ll decide to play a cover, only because bar-goers seem to love little kids mimicking Neil Young. We hope to record soon, but school is really an obstacle for us. Hopefully we’ll have our #1 album out by next year. Stay tuned!

Here’s the out-of-date description of our band, taken from our old website:

The Blisters have been together for nearly four years, and still maintain their original crispiness. The band was formed by Dylan and Spencer, who later recruited Henry and Hayden. Henry’s original role was pianist, but after their debut show he converted to guitar. Once they realized they needed a bassist, well, Henry switched again. Then they had Spencer on drums, Dylan on vocals, and Henry on bass. Then they needed a guitarist, so they searched through their school, and found Hayden. Then Dylan took up guitar as well, and Henry singing. So now, after long years of forming, switching, and settling, they are:

Spencer Tweedy - Drums

Dylan Johnson - Guitar, Vocals

Henry Mosher - Bass, Lead Vocals

Hayden Holbert - Lead Guitar

Wanna see some videos? DISCLAIMER: In the interest of our self-defense, I proclaim these videos nearly antiquated. Furthermore, we’re a lot different now. In short: These are very outdated, just to let you know. If you can’t see them here, go to http://tinyurl.com/6bvrjt.

What advice do you have for president-elect Barack Obama?

They might answer:

• Make fireworks completely legal in the United States.
• Eight year olds should be able to drive, poop/be naked in public, and buy shotguns.
• Give people the right to moon (…shove butt in people’s face). [?]
• Kids should have the choice of not going to school and not having homework.
• Obama, you should make everyone in the world invincible.

Here’s a more understandable, paraphrased version of the response:

Hi Obama,

I’ve got some advice for you. First off, and most importantly, I think that eight year olds should be able to drive, poop/be naked in public, and buy shotguns. My colleagues and I believe this is a crucial step in healing our country. Second of all, I believe everybody should have the right to moon (shove your butt in people’s faces), and.. Oh yeah! If you have some time, could you please make everyone in the world invincible?!

Thanks,
Kind, Loving, Eight Year Olds

These answers came from genuine eight-year olds and do not reflect my views or opinion.. or do they?

[?] denotes an answer that is incredibly strange or just plain unexpected

Please, please, submit your questions to me by using the Contact link above!

Coming next week: When You Ask An Eight Year Old… What are five things that annoy you?

Finally, our people have risen! I am a part of the Viet Minh, the first all-Vietnamese government in almost one hundred years. I, along with my friends, family, and nation, have recently joined together to fight against oppression, and to spread liberty and independence! The French, our tormentors, are described the same way by all of my people: ugly bastards. They claim their colonization of our country brought civilization to us, but we all know they bring nothing but misery.

The French put taxes on our important and much needed products, driving us nearly poor. This forced us to find new jobs, but those Frenchies own all of the railroads, mines, and plantations. We have no choice but to work for them. Through this aspect they control our lives, and it brings us much pain.

But now we rise as the Viet Minh, with our independent leader, Ho Chi Ming. Together our forces will spread communism and send our evil French influences out of our country.

At last, we have defeated our enemies: The French, and now the Japanese, who also tried to invade our land. Now, for the first time in our history, we’ve held national elections and we stand independent in our new country. Our enemies seem angry with our freedom, but my people and I will fight to the death to defend our nation’s new-found liberty.

We the people… is what separates the United States of America from all others. Our constitution, in unison with the Bill of Rights, protects our freedom as not only American citizens, but as humans. And this is what makes our country unique. Other nations have suffered from years or even decades of oppression, and others are not even lucky enough to have the privilege of democracy. Thus, their leaders are appointed utmost power, and rule with the norm of fear and destitution.

Our country’s constitution is the greatest form of law. It creates all high offices of our government, such as the Presidency, Supreme Court, and Congress. The constitution also acts as a safety device, ensuring that our leaders do not become dictators, and our democracy is secure. It was created in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, during the year 1787. The men who created it were named ‘The Framers’. It took the creators four months of debates and arguing to complete. Finally, after numerous compromises, the Constitution was adopted by the United States of America. But before this could happen, nine of the thirteen states were needed to approve the new plan. One of the most famous Framers, Ben Franklin, is said to have thought the Constitution is as perfect as it can be. Negotiations were made common during the ratification period of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights was actually added as a leverage tool to help it pass. And finally, history was made and our future was secured.

The Constitution can be modified by amendments. These amendments must pass Congress in order to be ratified. Once passed, the new law becomes part of our federal constitution, or in some cases, the state’s constitution. The amendment I will be studying is the 18th Amendment.

Alcohol prohibition was a defining time of our history. It was enacted by the 18th Amendment in the year 1917, but did not take full effect till early 1919 and 1920. The proposition of this amendment was influenced by an organization known as the Anti-Saloon League. Though not the majority, but a good number of people were against alcohol use because it caused a lot of bad behavior throughout the country. Nonetheless, the 18th Amendment was extremely unpopular, and conflict arose. Controversy was extremely predictable in this situation. Anything that interferes with an addictive substance, in this case, alcohol, is bound to create dispute.

Here is a copy of the amendment’s text:

Section 1. After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.

Section 2. The Congress and the several States shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Section 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.

Theoretically, the Anti-Saloon act and the 18thAmendment together would decrease nation-wide violence tremendously. But because of its lack of popularity, it didn’t last long. And furthermore, the result of this newly imposed alcohol prohibition, there was a surge in organized crime and illegal establishments. Once again, these things were easily predictable, considering that alcohol is known to induce rowdy or wild behavior.

Here’s an article written by John R. Vile, taken from Answers.com. It describes what happened during the case of Dillon v. Gloss, in which Dillon is convicted for violating the 18th Amendment’s law. This article is slightly confusing, so what it exactly tells is unclear.

“256 U.S. 368 (1921), argued 22 Mar. 1921, decided 16 May 1921 by vote of 9 to 0; Van Devanter for the Court. This case involved a conviction for transporting intoxicating liquors in violation of the Volstead Act. Dillon raised two issues. First, he challenged the provision requiring ratification of the Eighteenth Amendment within seven years. Second, he argued that the law under which he was charged was not effective until one year after the Eighteenth Amendment was proclaimed by the secretary of state (and hence after his arrest) rather than one year after its ratification. On the first issue, Justice Willis Van Devanter decided that Congress could set a reasonable deadline so that ratification was “sufficiently contemporaneous … to reflect the will of the people in all sections at relatively the same time period” (p. 375). On the second issue, the Court ruled that the amendment’s date of consummation, not its proclamation, was controlling. 

he Eighteenth Amendment was the first to specify a deadline within its text. When the Equal Rights Amendment was proposed, the deadline was placed in an accompanying authorizing resolution that, in a debated move, Congress later extended. Deadlines within the texts of amendments are presumably self‐enforcing. Without distinguishing internal from external deadlines, Dillon v. Gloss ruled that ratifications must be contemporaneous and left to the judgment of Congress. Coleman v. Miller (1939) reinforced and widened Dillon in declaring that the ratification issue was a political question for congressional resolution. Congress exercised its political power in 1992 by certifying as the Twenty‐seventh Amendment a limitation on the timing of congressional pay raises that was originally proposed as part of the Bill of Rights in 1789.” (http://www.answers.com/topic/dillon-v-gloss – John R. Vile)

On December 5, 1933, the 18th Amendment was repealed. In order for it to be repealed, another amendment was put in place to sort of “counter balance” the ever-so unpopular alcohol prohibition. This new counterbalancing amendment was called the 21st Amendment. It was the first amendment ever to repeal another. It took an astonishing thirteen and a half years for it to happen. Alcohol was allowed! I wasn’t there to experience it, but I’m sure that beer-lovers abroad were ecstatic at the announcement.

The drug wars of today are almost an exact parallel of the situation in 1920. The illegality of these substances in both situations created a massive and rich new industry and another problem for the government to fight. I think that this phenomenon could be what is holding the government back from banning other things, such as cigarettes.

My uncle’s home in Los Angeles, California, was featured on the show If Walls Could Talk because of its historical value. The west coast home’s basement was once an illegal bar during the times of alcohol prohibition, and is just one of the many fragments of history we discover every day. Maybe someday meth labs and marijuana dealers’ homes might be featured on television. Or not.

Our past–and future–would be very different without the 18thAmendment. That little stint of alcohol prohibition could very well be what gives millions of children today that one extra social studies lecture. I’d say anything that affects us in such a large scale is definitely worthy of “history made” status. Funny, though, that the same event that caused uprisings in crime nearly ninety years ago is viewed as a study topic today. But now, we end this study of the 18th Amendment with the notion that we the people love beer.

I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but Walt Disney pictures is an INSANELY successful business. The company is so broad, that it can afford to exclusively advertise its own products on its networks. Considering most other networks rely almost solely on advertising revenue, that is quite an accomplishment. How can they do this? Well, first we must ask, who is Walt Disney?

Born on December 5, 1901, Mr. Disney grew up on a farm. In high school, Disney was a cartoonist for the school newspaper, and later moved on to create advertisements for a company in Kansas City. There, he met one of his very good friends, who he later opened an art company with, but the friend left the company, and Disney assumed full control over their business. His career was fueled by his instinctive love of art and drawing, which proved to be a glorious trait.

Walt’s cartoons were a hit in Kansas, and inspired Walt to move to our entertainment capital, Hollywood, California. And the rest is history. Famous cartoons like Mickey Mouse rocketed him to the Hollywood Walk of Fame and coined him as the father of animation. This led to the massive franchise we know today as Disney.

In modern times, the Disney company has adapted to a new kind of market. And they’ve adapted quite well, considering their 35 billion dollar revenue and plethora of international fame. Disney has expanded, as well. They’ve had hundreds of movies produced, including long-time American favorites, such as Pinocchio, Snow White & The Seven Dwarfs, and Peter Pan. As a result of this, the Disney company now has hundreds of branches and underlying franchises, such as the Pirates of the Carribean movie series, whose fame can single-handedly provide another multimillion dollar asset, and the pattern continues. This is the exact framework that allows the Disney channel to advertise its own products, as opposed to selling ad-time to other companies/products.

Walt would be proud. Or would he?