<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: dark blue sea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html</link>
	<description>Very mine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-9009</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencertweedy.com/?p=4005#comment-9009</guid>
		<description>Got to consider a Nikon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to consider a Nikon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff  ( not  Spencer's dad)</title>
		<link>http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-8892</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff  ( not  Spencer's dad)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencertweedy.com/?p=4005#comment-8892</guid>
		<description>rocky  mountain oysters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rocky  mountain oysters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-8889</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencertweedy.com/?p=4005#comment-8889</guid>
		<description>Gorgeous photos. You really have to document the rest of your mom&#039;s unique Americana pop culture collection. You have a gift for capturing those images and it would make the coolest coffee table book. (It would also make her feel less like an OCD hoarder...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gorgeous photos. You really have to document the rest of your mom&#8217;s unique Americana pop culture collection. You have a gift for capturing those images and it would make the coolest coffee table book. (It would also make her feel less like an OCD hoarder&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-8888</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencertweedy.com/?p=4005#comment-8888</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d recommend a camera with bounce flash.  Those are amazing at helping you get wonderful photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d recommend a camera with bounce flash.  Those are amazing at helping you get wonderful photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mallory</title>
		<link>http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-8887</link>
		<dc:creator>Mallory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencertweedy.com/?p=4005#comment-8887</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a YOGA teacher..... so yes I&#039;m lookin for something under 200...lol!!!!! 
THANKYOU for the tips...
I was thinkin this???? 
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SD1200IS-Stabilized-Pink/dp/B001SER49C/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;s=photo&amp;qid=1257341639&amp;sr=1-12</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a YOGA teacher&#8230;.. so yes I&#8217;m lookin for something under 200&#8230;lol!!!!!<br />
THANKYOU for the tips&#8230;<br />
I was thinkin this????<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SD1200IS-Stabilized-Pink/dp/B001SER49C/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;s=photo&amp;qid=1257341639&amp;sr=1-12" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SD1200IS-Stabilized-Pink/dp/B001SER49C/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;s=photo&amp;qid=1257341639&amp;sr=1-12</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-8885</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencertweedy.com/?p=4005#comment-8885</guid>
		<description>Mike Cohen has it right, IMO. I shot the stuff here with my D40; the other pages linked out in the posting are either with the same D40 or the D50 from work:

http://indigestible.nightwares.com/2009/10/18/no-not-dead/

The caveat, though, is &quot;inexpensive&quot;, which is a relative term. IIRC my D40 set me back about US$600. If you&#039;re looking for something in the under-$200 range, Nikon and Canon both make some pretty good cameras. I&#039;d say they&#039;re probably about equal.

One thing to be aware of: Get a camera with optical zoom, not digital zoom. Optical zoom means there is an actual physical lens which is magnifying the image on the sensor; digital zooms basically expand the image electronically, like what you might do in Photoshop/Aperture/iPhoto. Artificially enlarging the image essentially magnifies the pixels, which can yield some pretty crunchy looking results.

If you&#039;re looking to pay less than $100, it might be better to just get a phone with a 3+ MP camera built in. The results will be about the same, and hey, you&#039;ll also have a phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Cohen has it right, IMO. I shot the stuff here with my D40; the other pages linked out in the posting are either with the same D40 or the D50 from work:</p>
<p><a href="http://indigestible.nightwares.com/2009/10/18/no-not-dead/" rel="nofollow">http://indigestible.nightwares.com/2009/10/18/no-not-dead/</a></p>
<p>The caveat, though, is &#8220;inexpensive&#8221;, which is a relative term. IIRC my D40 set me back about US$600. If you&#8217;re looking for something in the under-$200 range, Nikon and Canon both make some pretty good cameras. I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re probably about equal.</p>
<p>One thing to be aware of: Get a camera with optical zoom, not digital zoom. Optical zoom means there is an actual physical lens which is magnifying the image on the sensor; digital zooms basically expand the image electronically, like what you might do in Photoshop/Aperture/iPhoto. Artificially enlarging the image essentially magnifies the pixels, which can yield some pretty crunchy looking results.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking to pay less than $100, it might be better to just get a phone with a 3+ MP camera built in. The results will be about the same, and hey, you&#8217;ll also have a phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cohen</title>
		<link>http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-8883</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencertweedy.com/?p=4005#comment-8883</guid>
		<description>I agree with Christoph. Go with either Canon or Nikon. If you get one of their entry level cameras, if you decide to move up to a pro model you can keep the lenses &amp; other accessories.

Mallory - I&#039;m a Nikon guy so I&#039;ll recommend the D40 (or whatever new model replaces it). When I got my first DSLR I looked at both Nikon &amp; Canon and I just preferred the feel of the Nikon. It&#039;s a very subjective thing, so try both and see which one you feel more comfortable with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Christoph. Go with either Canon or Nikon. If you get one of their entry level cameras, if you decide to move up to a pro model you can keep the lenses &amp; other accessories.</p>
<p>Mallory &#8211; I&#8217;m a Nikon guy so I&#8217;ll recommend the D40 (or whatever new model replaces it). When I got my first DSLR I looked at both Nikon &amp; Canon and I just preferred the feel of the Nikon. It&#8217;s a very subjective thing, so try both and see which one you feel more comfortable with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-8882</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencertweedy.com/?p=4005#comment-8882</guid>
		<description>You might want to look at the raw image comparisons before you settle on anything. I did that (still do) when researching DSLRs, and to my eye, Nikon&#039;s chips are still just a weensy bit better than Canon. They tend to saturate out just a little more, which I like.

I&#039;d love to find a digital sensor that treated the world like Kodachrome 25 used to, but alas.

At work I have a Nikon D50, and I own a D40 as well. They&#039;re both quite decent, I think.

In-depth reviews can be found at DP Review (http://www.dpreview.com/), assuming you haven&#039;t been there yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to look at the raw image comparisons before you settle on anything. I did that (still do) when researching DSLRs, and to my eye, Nikon&#8217;s chips are still just a weensy bit better than Canon. They tend to saturate out just a little more, which I like.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to find a digital sensor that treated the world like Kodachrome 25 used to, but alas.</p>
<p>At work I have a Nikon D50, and I own a D40 as well. They&#8217;re both quite decent, I think.</p>
<p>In-depth reviews can be found at DP Review (<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/</a>), assuming you haven&#8217;t been there yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mallory</title>
		<link>http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-8879</link>
		<dc:creator>Mallory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencertweedy.com/?p=4005#comment-8879</guid>
		<description>I want that statuE..it ROCKS!!!! What&#039;s a good really INEXPENSIVE digital camera??? I need to get one ASAP. So I can join this whole world of facebook and create a website since my friends are harrassing me to!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want that statuE..it ROCKS!!!! What&#8217;s a good really INEXPENSIVE digital camera??? I need to get one ASAP. So I can join this whole world of facebook and create a website since my friends are harrassing me to!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph Z.</title>
		<link>http://spencertweedy.com/4005/dark-blue-sea.html/comment-page-1#comment-8878</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph Z.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencertweedy.com/?p=4005#comment-8878</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d go for Canon or Nikon. Even if you don&#039;t need many lenses (and you might change your opinion over the years;) both feel more \pro\ than a Sony cam does. I tried several cams before I ended up with Canon 5d Mark II and I had the feeling that even the entry-level Canons and Nikons have a better built quality than the Sonys. But after all it&#039;s a question of taste and I&#039;m sure that the Sonys will (as most dslrs today) produce decent pictures.
And it&#039;s still mostly about the photographer, not about the cam. Thus especially you will shoot great pictures with any cam :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d go for Canon or Nikon. Even if you don&#8217;t need many lenses (and you might change your opinion over the years;) both feel more \pro\ than a Sony cam does. I tried several cams before I ended up with Canon 5d Mark II and I had the feeling that even the entry-level Canons and Nikons have a better built quality than the Sonys. But after all it&#8217;s a question of taste and I&#8217;m sure that the Sonys will (as most dslrs today) produce decent pictures.<br />
And it&#8217;s still mostly about the photographer, not about the cam. Thus especially you will shoot great pictures with any cam :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
